What Is It Like To Be An Animal Without Self Consciousness

Do Animals Know Who they Are? (Op-Ed)

(Image credit: © Raywoo | Dreamstime.com)

Marc Bekoff, emeritus professor at the University of Colorado, Boulder, is one of the earth's pioneering cognitive ethologists, a Guggenheim Boyfriend, and co-founder with Jane Goodall of Ethologists for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. This essay is adapted from one that appeared in Bekoff's cavalcade Animal Emotions in Psychology Today. He contributed this article to LiveScience's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights.

Did David Greybeard, the chimpanzee who Jane Goodall notably was the first to observe using a tool, have whatsoever thought of who he was? Do elephants, dolphins, cats, magpies, mice, salmon, ants or bees know who they are? Was Jethro, my late companion dog, a cocky-conscious being? Do whatever of these animals have a sense of self?

What do these animals brand of themselves when they await in a mirror, see their reflection in h2o, hear their own or another's vocal or howl, or olfactory property themselves and others? Is information technology possible that self-awareness — "Wow that's me!" — is a uniquely human trait?

Because there's much interest and much exciting piece of work to be done apropos what animals know near themselves, it's worth reflecting on what nosotros do and don't know about animal selves. There are academic and practical reasons to do and so.

In his book, "The Descent of Human and Selection in Relation to Sex," Charles Darwin pondered what animals might know about themselves. He wrote: "It may be freely admitted that no creature is cocky-conscious, if past this term it is implied that he reflects on such points, as whence he comes or whither he will go, or what is life and death, and so forth."

However, Darwin did believe that animals had some sense of cocky, and as well championed the notion of evolutionary continuity, leading him to also write, "Still, the deviation in mind betwixt man and the higher animals, nifty as information technology is, certainly is one of degree and not of kind." Thus, in that location are shades of greyness and non blackness-and-white differences between humans and other animals in cognitive abilities. So, while animals might not ponder life and death the way humans do, they still may accept some sense of self.

After decades of studying animals ranging from coyotes and gray wolves to domestic dogs and Adelie penguins and other birds, I've come to the decision that not simply are some animals cocky-enlightened, but also that at that place are degrees of self-awareness. Combined with studies by my colleagues, information technology's wholly plausible to suggest that many animals have a sense of "mine-ness" or "body-ness." And then, for example, when an experimental handling, an object, or some other creature affects an individual, he or she experiences that "something is happening to this body."

Many primates relax when existence groomed and individuals of many species actively seek pleasance and avert hurting. There's no demand to associate "this body" with "my torso" or with "me" (or "I"). Many animals also know the placement in infinite of parts of their torso as they run, jump, perform acrobatics, or move as a coordinated hunting unit or flock without running into one some other. They know their body isn't someone else's body.

If you're a topical expert — researcher, business leader, author or innovator — and would like to contribute an op-ed piece, email us here. — If y'all're a topical adept — researcher, business leader, author or innovator — and would similar to contribute an op-ed slice, email united states of america here.

In my book, Minding Animals: Awareness, Emotions, and Centre (Oxford University Press; 2003), and elsewhere, I fence that a sense of trunk-ness is necessary and sufficient for most animals to engage in social activities that are needed in the social milieus in which they live. But, while a sense of body-ness is necessary for humans to get along in many of the situations they meet, information technology's often not sufficient for them to function as they demand to. A human being typically knows who he or she is, say by name, and knows that "this body" is his, Marc'due south, or him, Marc. There'southward a sense of "I-ness" that's an extension of "body-ness" or "mine-ness."

And so, my accept on beast selves is that David Greybeard and Jethro knew they weren't one of their buddies. Many animals know such facts as "this is my tail," "this is my territory," "this is my os or my piece of elk," "this is my mate," and "this is my urine." Their sense of mine-ness or body-ness is their sense of self.

How exercise animals differentiate themselves from others? Many studies of self-awareness have used mirrors to assess how visual cues are used. Such studies been constructive for captive primates, dolphins and elephants. Although mirror-like visual images are absent in nigh field situations, it's possible that individuals learn something about themselves from their reflections in water. But, scientists likewise need to know more about the office of senses other than vision in studies of self-awareness because some animals — for instance, rodents — who can distinguish among individuals don't seem to respond to visual images.

Odors and sounds are very important in the worlds of many animals. Many mammals differentiate between their ain and others' urine and glandular secretions, and many birds know their own and others' songs. Moving Jethro'due south "yellowish snow" from place to place allowed me to learn that Jethro made fine discriminations betwixt his ain and others' urine. Perhaps a sense of self relies on a composite signal that results from integrating information from dissimilar senses.

While there are "academic" questions nearly animal self-sensation, there too are some very important applied reasons to larn about animal selves. Achieving reliable answers to such questions is critical since they're often used to defend the sorts of treatment to which individuals can be ethically subjected. However, fifty-fifty if an fauna doesn't know "who" she is, this doesn't hateful she can't feel that something painful is happening to her body. Self-awareness may not be a reliable examination for an objective cess of well-existence.

So, do any animals, when looking at themselves, hearing themselves,or smelling themselves, exclaim "Wow, that'due south me"? Do they have a sense of "I-ness?" We really don't know, especially for wild animals. It'southward fourth dimension to become out of the armchair and into the field. Speculation doesn't substitute for conscientious studies of behavior.

Some people don't desire to admit the possibility of cocky-awareness in animals considering if they practice, the borders betwixt humans and other animals become blurred and their narrow, hierarchical, anthropocentric view of the earth would be toppled. Simply Darwin's ideas about continuity, along with empirical information and mutual sense, circumspection against the unyielding claim that humans — and perchance a few other animals, such as other great apes and cetaceans — are the only species in which some sense of self has evolved.

Bekoff's nigh contempo Op-Ed was " Are Pigs as Smart as Dogs, and Does Information technology Really Matter? " This article appeared equally " Practice Animals Know Who they Are? " in Psychology Today . More of the author'southward essays are available in " Why Dogs Hump and Bees Go Depressed (opens in new tab) " (New World Library, 2013). The views expressed are those of the writer and exercise non necessarily reflect the views of the publisher. This version of the article was originally published on LiveScience.